Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2016-04-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-12-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-12-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-12-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-12-01 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 268.95 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 494 µg/L | 148/185 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 24.46 µg/L 163% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 143 µg/L | 93/185 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.88 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60.6 µg/L | 69/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 26.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 196 µg/L | 69/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.6 µg/L | 62/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 25.625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 131.3 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 43.025 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 284 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 36.82 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 224 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.505 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 79.1 µg/L | 60/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.205 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L | 40/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 795 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 850 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.3225 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3700 µg/L | 20/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 20/20 | LCR | 2023 |
| Simazine | 0.3100 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 15/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 6.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L | 13/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 19 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 795 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 850 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Barium | 80.92 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 81.6 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 385 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Cyanide | 140 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.4 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.19 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.855 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 2/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 2/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dalapon | 6.1 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.9700 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 3.2 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
77 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Kingsbridge Mud
Is Kingsbridge Mud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 32 contaminants in Kingsbridge Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Kingsbridge Mud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Kingsbridge Mud serve?
Kingsbridge Mud reports serving 8,663 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Kingsbridge Mud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 370 violations on file for Kingsbridge Mud, of which 47 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.