Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFBS | 0.0092 µg/L | 2/4 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 130.4 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 220 µg/L | 64/67 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 17.95 pCi/L 120% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 19 pCi/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.3 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 21/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 5.425 pCi/L 109% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.8 pCi/L | 16/21 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 13.836 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 14/67 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00030 mg/L 2% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromoform | 4.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 9/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 7.42 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 pCi/L | 9/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.165 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L | 8/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 20 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 5.085 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 174.7 µg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 178 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 958.5 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 960 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lithium | 17.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| TTHM | 3.74 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.78 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 2/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 19.5 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
91 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Blue Ridge West Mud
Is Blue Ridge West Mud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Blue Ridge West Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Blue Ridge West Mud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Combined Uranium, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Blue Ridge West Mud serve?
Blue Ridge West Mud reports serving 7,545 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Blue Ridge West Mud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 35 violations on file for Blue Ridge West Mud, of which 32 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.