Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Equestrian Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
21
detected
129
people served
12
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Erath

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
849
violations on file
7
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-12-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-12-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-12-01 → 2011-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
88 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L
42/47 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
1350 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
37.5 µg/L 250%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 46 µg/L
11/47 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
230 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
320.9 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 321 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1316 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1320 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Bromodichloromethane
2.8535 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.95 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
8.6865 µg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.97 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.7 pCi/L 54%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 2/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Combined Uranium
1.69 µg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
9.9 pCi/L 66%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 10 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Gross Beta Particle Activity
5.63 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Lead
0.0021 mg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 2/2 LCR 2023
Bromoform
1.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
3.37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
2.7 µg/L 5.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
10.3 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.3 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2019
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FLETCHER, DONALD, S

Frequently asked questions about Equestrian Estates

Is Equestrian Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Equestrian Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Equestrian Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Barium, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Equestrian Estates serve?

Equestrian Estates reports serving 129 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Equestrian Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 849 violations on file for Equestrian Estates, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 7 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.