← Texas

Tap water quality report

Horizon Regional Mud

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
23
detected
31,542
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
El Paso

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
22
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromoform
36.125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.3 µg/L
94/110 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
44.415 µg/L 56%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.8 µg/L
94/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
245.45 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 299 µg/L
88/92 SYR4 2013–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
9.7 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.3 µg/L
71/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9.083 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.93 µg/L
68/110 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
55/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
6740 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6860 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
10.625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.1 µg/L
36/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.028 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
18/92 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
0.00071 mg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
6776 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6860 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.7465 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.85 µg/L
10/110 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
15.15 µg/L 152%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2015–2018
Fluoride
725.7 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 762 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
31.1 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Chromium
7.14 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Combined Uranium
4.43 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2015
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.95 pCi/L 26%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2015
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.435 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2015
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
9.7 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Lithium
81.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2024
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/102 SYR4 2012–2019
86 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JARVIS, GORDON
Phone
915-852-3917

Frequently asked questions about Horizon Regional Mud

Is Horizon Regional Mud tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Horizon Regional Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Horizon Regional Mud's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromoform, TTHM, Copper, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Horizon Regional Mud serve?

Horizon Regional Mud reports serving 31,542 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Horizon Regional Mud had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for Horizon Regional Mud, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.