Is Huber Garden Estates Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Ector

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

148

health-based violations

235

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Unaddressed	2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Unaddressed	2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Nitrate	11205 µg/L 112% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 12400 µg/L	64/64	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	90.5 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 116 µg/L	16/17	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	10281 µg/L 103% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 12400 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2012–2015
Bromoform	5.949 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.03 µg/L	7/9	SYR4	2013–2019
Fluoride	2074 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 2130 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	2.336 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 2.44 µg/L	3/17	SYR4	2012–2019
Arsenic	3.2715 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Barium	63.31 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 63.8 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Chromium	4.9641 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Combined Uranium	10.16 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid	4.255 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	10.75 pCi/L 72% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 11 pCi/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity	7.785 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.8 pCi/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Lead	0.0177 mg/L 118% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L	2/2	LCR	2025
Selenium	7.985 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
TTHM	6.0165 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 6.03 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	16.89 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 17.6 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Cyanide	23.2 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	1.03 pCi/L 21% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L	1/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid	13.3 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/2	SYR4	2016–2019

59 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: STOCK, CLAYTON, J
Phone: 432-312-6545
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Huber Garden Estates

Is Huber Garden Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Huber Garden Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Huber Garden Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromoform, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Huber Garden Estates serve?

Huber Garden Estates reports serving 200 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Huber Garden Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 235 violations on file for Huber Garden Estates, of which 148 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.