← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Los Fresnos

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 27. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
27
detected
6,009
people served
74
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cameron

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

74
health-based violations
296
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2016-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
202.3 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 490 µg/L
63/63 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromodichloromethane
3.815 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
2.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
56/60 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
19.17 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L
50/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
13.465 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L
50/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
6.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L
49/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
48/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
47/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.025 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
26/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
280 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Lead
5.22 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
13/63 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
145.45 µg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
486.5 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 490 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
130 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Selenium
3.98 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
2.185 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
50.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2023
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
0.2760 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.1300 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
1.58 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
1.9 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity
7.5 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Thallium, Total
0.5300 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
80 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MILUM, MARK
Phone
956-233-5768
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City of Los Fresnos

Is City of Los Fresnos tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in City of Los Fresnos's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Los Fresnos's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Los Fresnos serve?

City of Los Fresnos reports serving 6,009 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Los Fresnos had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 296 violations on file for City of Los Fresnos, of which 74 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.