Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 402.95 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1008 µg/L | 54/64 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Lead | 0.00080 mg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 2.555 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 10/64 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Bromoform | 3.73 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 8/20 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.93 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 8/20 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.15 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 60.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/6 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| TTHM | 5.68 µg/L 7.1% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 5/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 228.55 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 238 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.63 pCi/L 73% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.8 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 110 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 11.25 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.4 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 6.51 pCi/L 43% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 6.6 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Nitrate | 20 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 0.5950 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6000 µg/L | 2/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
93 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Poteet
Is City of Poteet tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in City of Poteet's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Poteet's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Poteet serve?
City of Poteet reports serving 3,396 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Poteet had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 88 violations on file for City of Poteet, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.