Tap WaterIndex

← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Dcws Conoflow (sc1820007)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
14
detected
150
people served
0
health-based violations
South Carolina rankingsLead in South CarolinaPFAS in South Carolina
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Dorchester

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
8
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
13.422 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.71 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
52.8909 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58.6147 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
36.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.49 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
22.7484 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.3562 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
71.1348 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.6 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
36.8762 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 40.4571 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.3576 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.3846 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0048 mg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2023
Nitrate
26 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 8/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
12 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
5/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
3.08 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
5/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.3425 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.47 µg/L
4/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
490 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/17 SYR4 2012–2019
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HARPER, LARRY
Phone
843-832-0075
Email
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Dcws Conoflow (sc1820007)

Is Dcws Conoflow (sc1820007) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Dcws Conoflow (sc1820007)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Dcws Conoflow (sc1820007)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Dcws Conoflow (sc1820007) serve?

Dcws Conoflow (sc1820007) reports serving 150 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Dcws Conoflow (sc1820007) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Dcws Conoflow (sc1820007), of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.