Tap WaterIndex

← Rhode Island

Tap water quality report

South Kingstown Nursing and Rehab

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 67 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

67
contaminants tested
12
detected
232
people served
26
health-based violations
Rhode Island rankingsLead in Rhode IslandPFAS in Rhode Island
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Washington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

26
health-based violations
60
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1951.5 µg/L 150%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 4470 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
352.4 µg/L 2349%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 674 µg/L
27/50 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 24/24 LCR 2023
Nitrate
2820 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
1440 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1450 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Uranium
161.562 µg/L 539%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 183.27 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
57.25 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 61 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
2.08 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
1673 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1690 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
29.52 pCi/L 197%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 32 pCi/L
3/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/5 SYR4 2014–2015
Gross Beta Particle Activity
5.16 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2014
55 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MURPHY, MARISSA
Phone
401-783-8568
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about South Kingstown Nursing and Rehab

Is South Kingstown Nursing and Rehab tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in South Kingstown Nursing and Rehab's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in South Kingstown Nursing and Rehab's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Nitrate-Nitrite, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does South Kingstown Nursing and Rehab serve?

South Kingstown Nursing and Rehab reports serving 232 people in Rhode Island, per its EPA record.

Has South Kingstown Nursing and Rehab had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 60 violations on file for South Kingstown Nursing and Rehab, of which 26 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.