← Pennsylvania

Tap water quality report

Perkasie Regional Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 36. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
36
detected
15,000
people served
14
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Bucks

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

14
health-based violations
734
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-01-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-01-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-01-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-01-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-01-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-01-01 → 2006-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOS 0.0176 µg/L 6/8 2024
PFOA 0.0065 µg/L 3/8 2024
PFBS 0.0049 µg/L 2/8 2024
PFHXS 0.0051 µg/L 1/8 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Arsenic
15.7 µg/L 157%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.1 µg/L
362/362 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
518.1 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 952 µg/L
134/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9.045 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L
83/83 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
12.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.3 µg/L
75/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
13.91 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.9 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.889 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.45 µg/L
63/76 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
38.025 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 44 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.89 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
51/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
8.8 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
45/90 SYR4 2013–2019
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
15.9 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.6 µg/L
37/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroethylene
38.475 µg/L 770%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 74.1 µg/L
34/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
5.8 µg/L 116%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 84 µg/L
26/80 SYR4 2012–2019
1,1-Dichloroethylene
7.02 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 7 µg/L
worst single sample: 77 µg/L
25/79 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
788 µg/L 7.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
14/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2025
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
3.84 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
9/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
943.2 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L
9/53 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.7065 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.78 µg/L
8/10 SYR4 2018–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
7.917 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.2 µg/L
8/10 SYR4 2018–2019
Lithium
19.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/8 UCMR-5 2024
Dichloroacetic Acid
9.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.8 µg/L
7/10 SYR4 2018–2019
Combined Uranium
5.97974 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.98235 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
4.825 µg/L 9.7%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
106.92 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2013
Chromium
3.3 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012
Mercury
0.0772 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0780 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2012–2013
Antimony, Total
0.2255 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2300 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2012
Dichloromethane
1.96 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Beryllium, Total
0.0700 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2012
Cadmium
0.1100 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2012
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Thallium, Total
0.2400 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2012
73 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneChlorobenzeneCyanideCarbofuranChlordaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, TotalO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NICK FRETZ
Phone
215-257-3654

Frequently asked questions about Perkasie Regional Authority

Is Perkasie Regional Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 36 contaminants in Perkasie Regional Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Perkasie Regional Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Perkasie Regional Authority serve?

Perkasie Regional Authority reports serving 15,000 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.

Has Perkasie Regional Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 734 violations on file for Perkasie Regional Authority, of which 14 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.