← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 88 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

88
contaminants tested
24
detected
8,398
people served
286
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Jefferson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

286
health-based violations
1,281
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0111 µg/L 4/6 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
161.1 µg/L 201%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 189.7 µg/L
61/76 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
228.05 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 692 µg/L
58/60 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
53.755 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 63.1 µg/L
54/83 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
61.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 106 µg/L
53/83 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
50.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64.8 µg/L
53/83 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.745 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.3 µg/L
40/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
42.5 µg/L 71%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 58.4 µg/L
37/76 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
16.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.2 µg/L
31/83 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1387.5 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L
26/44 SYR4 2014–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
18.5 pCi/L 123%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 21.5 pCi/L
23/23 SYR4 2015–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
20/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
8.331 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.52 µg/L
19/23 SYR4 2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
19.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.2 µg/L
19/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.902 pCi/L 78%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.49 pCi/L
13/23 SYR4 2015–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
7.4685 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.97 pCi/L
12/23 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2024
Barium
265 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 266 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2015–2018
Fluoride
344 µg/L 8.6%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2015–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.335 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
4/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.105 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
4/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
38.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/6 UCMR-5 2024
Chromium
9.9 µg/L 9.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
8.9 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/60 SYR4 2012–2018
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebDiquatEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JEFFERSON CO CONS RWD #1
Phone
580-963-3161
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1

Is Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1 serve?

Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1 reports serving 8,398 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 1281 violations on file for Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1, of which 286 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.