Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0111 µg/L | 4/6 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 161.1 µg/L 201% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 189.7 µg/L | 61/76 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 228.05 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 692 µg/L | 58/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 53.755 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 63.1 µg/L | 54/83 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 61.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 106 µg/L | 53/83 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 50.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64.8 µg/L | 53/83 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 17.745 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.3 µg/L | 40/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 42.5 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 58.4 µg/L | 37/76 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 16.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.2 µg/L | 31/83 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1387.5 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L | 26/44 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 18.5 pCi/L 123% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 21.5 pCi/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L | 20/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 8.331 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.52 µg/L | 19/23 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 19.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.2 µg/L | 19/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.902 pCi/L 78% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.49 pCi/L | 13/23 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 7.4685 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.97 pCi/L | 12/23 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2024 |
| Barium | 265 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 266 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Fluoride | 344 µg/L 8.6% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.335 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 4/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.105 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L | 4/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 38.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/6 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Chromium | 9.9 µg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Lead | 8.9 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
64 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1
Is Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1 serve?
Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1 reports serving 8,398 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 1281 violations on file for Jefferson Co Cons Rwd #1, of which 286 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.