Tap WaterIndex

← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Mooreland

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 69 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

69
contaminants tested
19
detected
1,226
people served
308
health-based violations
Oklahoma rankingsLead in OklahomaPFAS in Oklahoma
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Woodward

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

308
health-based violations
466
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
279 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 646 µg/L
39/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
8018 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8740 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0194 mg/L 129%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2025
Dibromochloromethane
3.816 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.98 µg/L
9/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.588 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.68 pCi/L
9/9 SYR4 2016–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.8263 pCi/L 17%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.8350 pCi/L
8/8 SYR4 2016–2018
Combined Uranium
1.762 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.79 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2016–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.551 pCi/L 17%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.74 pCi/L
8/9 SYR4 2016–2018
Bromodichloromethane
3.131 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.26 µg/L
7/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
5.454 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.76 µg/L
7/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
6060 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 6/6 SYR4 2012–2013
Lead
18.36 µg/L 122%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.7 µg/L
5/44 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
10.46 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.9685 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.765 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
2.269 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
3/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
256.95 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 261 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2017
Fluoride
297 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2014–2019
50 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MOORELAND
Phone
580-994-5925
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Mooreland

Is Mooreland tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Mooreland's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mooreland's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, Gross Beta Particle Activity, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mooreland serve?

Mooreland reports serving 1,226 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Mooreland had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 466 violations on file for Mooreland, of which 308 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.