Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-02-01 → 1992-02-29 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1991-07-01 → 1991-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1991-07-01 → 1991-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 262.3 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 497 µg/L | 55/59 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 8170 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0012 mg/L 8% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.6275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.76 µg/L | 6/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.4625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 6/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 7.3875 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.52 µg/L | 6/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.8925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.23 µg/L | 6/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 24.875 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.5 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.3475 µg/L 7.2% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.47 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.512 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.52 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.8915 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.95 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Barium | 243 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 244 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.4291 pCi/L 8.6% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.4500 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.9075 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.93 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Fluoride | 237 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 1.9345 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.96 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Lithium | 14.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Arsenic | 6 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.3300 pCi/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Lead | 14.2 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/59 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
66 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Alva
Is Alva tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Alva's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Alva's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Alva serve?
Alva reports serving 5,208 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Alva had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 69 violations on file for Alva, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.