Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-05-01 → 2022-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-05-01 → 2022-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-05-01 → 2022-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-05-01 → 2022-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-04-01 → 2009-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-04-01 → 2009-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-04-01 → 2009-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-04-01 → 2009-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-02-01 → 2006-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-02-01 → 2006-02-28 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dibromochloromethane | 12.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.8 µg/L | 72/78 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 12.33 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L | 70/78 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.329 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.2 µg/L | 68/78 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.7345 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.28 µg/L | 64/77 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 31.6 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.7 µg/L | 61/77 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.99 µg/L | 52/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.524 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L | 38/78 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.84 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.99 µg/L | 28/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3749.5 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3830 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 52 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Copper | 14.75 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 2/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.8109 pCi/L 16% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.8380 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 6.2175 pCi/L 41% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 6.31 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.6325 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.65 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.0945 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.11 µg/L | 2/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1840 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.682 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.77 µg/L | 2/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 31 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Fluoride | 230 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Nitrite | 470 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Bethany
Is Bethany tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Bethany's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Bethany's water?
EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Bethany serve?
Bethany reports serving 20,307 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Bethany had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 127 violations on file for Bethany, of which 61 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.