← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Purcell

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 88 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

88
contaminants tested
19
detected
6,693
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
McClain

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
69
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-02-01 → 1991-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2023-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2023-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2023-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2023-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2023-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2023-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2023-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-09-01 → 2023-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-08-24

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
133.8 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 282 µg/L
57/63 SYR4 2013–2017
Fluoride
920 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 930 µg/L
55/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.9276 pCi/L 39%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.24 pCi/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
7.696 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.08 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
7.524 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.62 pCi/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
3.225 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
8/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.3545 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
8/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
17.18 pCi/L 115%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 19 pCi/L
8/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.952 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
7/13 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
10.17 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
170 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
6/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
460.2 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 477 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
18.505 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
48.495 µg/L 323%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 50.6 µg/L
2/63 SYR4 2013–2017
Selenium
6.235 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Lithium
15.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2023
Arsenic
7 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2013–2018
Chloroform
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/13 SYR4 2012–2019
69 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHfpo-DaMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PURCELL
Phone
405-527-6561
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Purcell

Is Purcell tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Purcell's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Purcell's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Purcell serve?

Purcell reports serving 6,693 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Purcell had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 69 violations on file for Purcell, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.