← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Kremlin-Hillsdale Rural Water District 1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 51 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

51
contaminants tested
15
detected
320
people served
79
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Garfield

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

79
health-based violations
154
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1762.5 µg/L 136%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2470 µg/L
70/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
25/25 LCR 2025
Dibromochloromethane
1.546 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.59 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
9496 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9520 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.2265 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.23 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.5125 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.82 pCi/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.8290 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8500 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.7619 pCi/L 35%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.95 pCi/L
4/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.1716 pCi/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.26 pCi/L
3/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
132.93 µg/L 886%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 147 µg/L
3/71 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
2.793 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.81 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.1695 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.17 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate
9229 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.1695 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.17 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrite
1 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
36 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DArsenicBenzeneChlorobenzeneCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidPentachlorophenolPicloramStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GARFIELD CO RWD #1 (KREM-HILL)
Phone
580-548-3697
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kremlin-Hillsdale Rural Water District 1

Is Kremlin-Hillsdale Rural Water District 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Kremlin-Hillsdale Rural Water District 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kremlin-Hillsdale Rural Water District 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kremlin-Hillsdale Rural Water District 1 serve?

Kremlin-Hillsdale Rural Water District 1 reports serving 320 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Kremlin-Hillsdale Rural Water District 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 154 violations on file for Kremlin-Hillsdale Rural Water District 1, of which 79 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.