Is Weatherford Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Custer

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

328

health-based violations

403

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	167 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 342 µg/L	241/243	SYR4	2012–2017
Arsenic	5.3 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L	61/70	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	7440 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 7920 µg/L	50/50	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	9.42 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L	23/25	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	7.44 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L	17/25	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	16/16	LCR	2023
TTHM	26.075 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 30.2 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2014–2019
Combined Uranium	3.05 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L	11/12	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	6.2 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L	11/12	SYR4	2014–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	3.495 pCi/L 23% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 3.52 pCi/L	11/12	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	10.655 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 14.4 µg/L	8/12	SYR4	2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane	5.29 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L	7/25	SYR4	2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	2.364 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.43 pCi/L	5/12	SYR4	2012–2019
Lithium	26.9 µg/L No EPA limit set	4/4	UCMR-5	2023
Chloroform	7.59 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L	3/25	SYR4	2012–2019
Atrazine	0.1570 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L worst single sample: 0.1600 µg/L	2/9	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	144.885 µg/L 7.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 149 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2013
Dichloroacetic Acid	3.195 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L	2/12	SYR4	2014–2019
Fluoride	393 µg/L 9.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 400 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2013
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	1.403 pCi/L 28% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L	1/12	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	5.1 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L	1/243	SYR4	2012–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid	2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/12	SYR4	2014–2019

73 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHfpo-DaLassoMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: WEATHERFORD
Phone: 580-774-4501
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Weatherford

Is Weatherford tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Weatherford's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Weatherford's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Arsenic, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Weatherford serve?

Weatherford reports serving 10,833 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Weatherford had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 403 violations on file for Weatherford, of which 328 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.