← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Cotton Co Rwd #2

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 74 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

74
contaminants tested
19
detected
3,000
people served
194
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cotton

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

194
health-based violations
233
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
9871 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 15500 µg/L
118/138 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
14.075 µg/L 141%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.9 µg/L
38/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
151 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 178 µg/L
19/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
4212.5 µg/L 105%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4310 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2024
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
4.41175 pCi/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.075 pCi/L
8/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.015 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.61 pCi/L
8/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
8.009 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.17 µg/L
7/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.472 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.73 µg/L
7/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.864 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.95 µg/L
7/14 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
20.73 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 22.8 µg/L
7/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.5125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.35 µg/L
6/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.1925 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L
6/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.3194 pCi/L 46%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.58 pCi/L
5/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
509.3 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 536 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014
Chloroform
3.3385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.43 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
1.797 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
7.204 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.52 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Mercury
0.6000 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014
55 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
COTTON CO RWD #2
Phone
580-585-1384
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cotton Co Rwd #2

Is Cotton Co Rwd #2 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Cotton Co Rwd #2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cotton Co Rwd #2's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Arsenic, Copper, Fluoride, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cotton Co Rwd #2 serve?

Cotton Co Rwd #2 reports serving 3,000 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Cotton Co Rwd #2 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 233 violations on file for Cotton Co Rwd #2, of which 194 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.