← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Mustang, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 101 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

101
contaminants tested
21
detected
18,576
people served
32
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Canadian

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

32
health-based violations
89
violations on file
7
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
208.2 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 323 µg/L
89/98 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
51.17 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.92 µg/L
64/74 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
30.913 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.4 µg/L
47/74 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.3 µg/L
42/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
30.77 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.9 µg/L
42/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
11.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L
42/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
16.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.7 µg/L
41/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
12.255 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.4 µg/L
40/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
38.24 µg/L 382%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.2 µg/L
33/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
9.635 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.1 µg/L
30/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.0495 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.21 µg/L
28/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00020 mg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2026
Nitrate-Nitrite
725 µg/L 7.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 760 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
20.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/6 UCMR-5 2023
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.4875 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.54 µg/L
4/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
3880 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2013
Lead
19.633 µg/L 131%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.7 µg/L
3/98 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.16505 pCi/L 63%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.3 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Uranium
12.635 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.3095 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.33 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
11.6 pCi/L 77%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
80 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneChlorobenzeneCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CITY OF MUSTANG
Phone
405-376-4521
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Mustang, City of

Is Mustang, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Mustang, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mustang, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mustang, City of serve?

Mustang, City of reports serving 18,576 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Mustang, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 89 violations on file for Mustang, City of, of which 32 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 7 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.