← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

El Reno

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 88 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

88
contaminants tested
22
detected
16,212
people served
146
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Canadian

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

146
health-based violations
334
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
91.39 µg/L 114%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 108.4 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
21.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.3 µg/L
126/126 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
48.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58.4 µg/L
126/126 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
34.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.4 µg/L
126/126 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
41.24 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.5 µg/L
125/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
23.14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.7 µg/L
113/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
28.32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.3 µg/L
110/126 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
13.315 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L
98/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
14.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.8 µg/L
96/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
302 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 661 µg/L
81/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
63/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
20/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
480 µg/L 4.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Barium
19.8 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.4 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Fluoride
415 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 420 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
21.625 µg/L 144%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 22.9 µg/L
6/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.42 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.49 pCi/L
5/7 SYR4 2015–2016
Lithium
132 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2025
Arsenic
2.172 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.18 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2014–2018
Combined Uranium
1.297 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2015–2016
Dalapon
3.94 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2018–2019
66 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDinosebEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
EL RENO
Phone
405-262-3620
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about El Reno

Is El Reno tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in El Reno's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in El Reno's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does El Reno serve?

El Reno reports serving 16,212 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has El Reno had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 334 violations on file for El Reno, of which 146 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.