Tap WaterIndex

← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Wagoner

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 89 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

89
contaminants tested
17
detected
7,982
people served
70
health-based violations
Oklahoma rankingsLead in OklahomaPFAS in Oklahoma
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Wagoner

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

70
health-based violations
112
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
89.33 µg/L 112%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 114 µg/L
72/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
67.295 µg/L 112%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 75 µg/L
72/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
18.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.4 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
68.49 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 90.1 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.2605 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.16 µg/L
60/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30.355 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.9 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
31.545 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.2 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
495.1 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 643 µg/L
59/60 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0027 mg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 23/23 LCR 2026
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.8325 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.93 µg/L
16/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
920 µg/L 9.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.178 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.77 µg/L
9/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Chlorite
50.13 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 51.3 µg/L
2/12 SYR4 2015
Barium
40.2 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.06 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Lead
5.2 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 1/60 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/60 SYR4 2012–2019
72 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WAGONER
Phone
918-485-2554
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Wagoner

Is Wagoner tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Wagoner's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wagoner's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wagoner serve?

Wagoner reports serving 7,982 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Wagoner had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 112 violations on file for Wagoner, of which 70 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.