Is Rogers Co Rwd # 4 Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Surface water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Rogers

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

139

health-based violations

275

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Addressed	2024-10-17
TT	Health-based	Addressed	2024-10-17
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).

Contaminant	Max	Detection rate	Period
Pfba	0.0056 µg/L	1/4	2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Bromodichloromethane	22.03 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 26.2 µg/L	79/79	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	83.35 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 146 µg/L	79/79	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	8.449 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.86 µg/L	78/79	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	109 µg/L 136% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 169 µg/L	76/76	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	43.46 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 60.9 µg/L	75/76	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	77.7 µg/L 130% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L worst single sample: 107 µg/L	75/76	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	34.58 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 45.9 µg/L	74/76	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	136 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 478 µg/L	41/60	SYR4	2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid	2.9795 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.16 µg/L	38/76	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	15/15	LCR	2025
Nitrate-Nitrite	487 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	10/14	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	5.871 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.03 µg/L	7/76	SYR4	2012–2019
Atrazine	0.7410 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L worst single sample: 0.7750 µg/L	3/7	SYR4	2018–2019
Lead	47.7 µg/L 318% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L worst single sample: 48 µg/L	3/60	SYR4	2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid	1.5625 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.57 µg/L	2/76	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	58 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2012
Bromoform	1.03 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/79	SYR4	2012–2019
Fluoride	730 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2012
Gross Beta Particle Activity	6.64 pCi/L No EPA limit set	1/1	SYR4	2017

80 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: ROGERS CO RWD # 4
Phone: 918-443-2542
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rogers Co Rwd # 4

Is Rogers Co Rwd # 4 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Rogers Co Rwd # 4's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rogers Co Rwd # 4's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rogers Co Rwd # 4 serve?

Rogers Co Rwd # 4 reports serving 7,725 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Rogers Co Rwd # 4 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 275 violations on file for Rogers Co Rwd # 4, of which 139 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.