Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 15.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.01 µg/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 767 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1640 µg/L | 51/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 56.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 68.9 µg/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.76 µg/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 71.98 µg/L 90% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 86.2 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 71.58 µg/L 119% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 88.4 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 35.52 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.8 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 35.906 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.6 µg/L | 48/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.7945 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.11 µg/L | 30/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0043 mg/L 29% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 640 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 45.4895 µg/L 303% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 62 µg/L | 7/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.864 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.87 µg/L | 5/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.08 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 50 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Fluoride | 150 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.57 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
33 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Chelsea Economic Dev. Auth.
Is Chelsea Economic Dev. Auth. tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Chelsea Economic Dev. Auth.'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Chelsea Economic Dev. Auth.'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Copper, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Chelsea Economic Dev. Auth. serve?
Chelsea Economic Dev. Auth. reports serving 1,964 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Chelsea Economic Dev. Auth. had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 188 violations on file for Chelsea Economic Dev. Auth., of which 29 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.