Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-09-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-09-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-09-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-09-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0079 µg/L | 1/4 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 97.75 µg/L 122% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 105 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 19.595 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.9 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 28.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 53/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 27.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.8 µg/L | 53/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 35.58 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.4 µg/L | 53/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 12.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.4 µg/L | 51/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.553 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.65 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 10.9065 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.8 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 7.761 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 128.25 µg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 149 µg/L | 48/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 290 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.369 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.39 µg/L | 8/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.532 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.55 µg/L | 2/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 36 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.3880 pCi/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Fluoride | 340 µg/L 8.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.23 pCi/L 8.2% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.2 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
60 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Skiatook Pwa
Is Skiatook Pwa tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Skiatook Pwa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Skiatook Pwa's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Skiatook Pwa serve?
Skiatook Pwa reports serving 8,110 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Skiatook Pwa had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 377 violations on file for Skiatook Pwa, of which 261 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.