← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Skiatook Pwa

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
20
detected
8,110
people served
261
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Osage

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

261
health-based violations
377
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-09-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0079 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
97.75 µg/L 122%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 105 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
19.595 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.9 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
28.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
27.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.8 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
35.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.4 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
12.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.4 µg/L
51/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.553 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.65 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
10.9065 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.8 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
7.761 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
128.25 µg/L 9.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 149 µg/L
48/64 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
290 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.369 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.39 µg/L
8/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.532 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.55 µg/L
2/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
36 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3880 pCi/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Fluoride
340 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.23 pCi/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity
2.2 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2017
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaLeadMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SKIATOOK PWA
Phone
918-396-2797
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Skiatook Pwa

Is Skiatook Pwa tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Skiatook Pwa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Skiatook Pwa's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Skiatook Pwa serve?

Skiatook Pwa reports serving 8,110 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Skiatook Pwa had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 377 violations on file for Skiatook Pwa, of which 261 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.