Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 30.044 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.1 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 216.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 309 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 72.159 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 89 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 250.964 µg/L 314% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 343 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 175.827 µg/L 293% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 204 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 77.805 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 99.8 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 11.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L | 42/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 39.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.18 µg/L | 41/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.98 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 13/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 836.75 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1120 µg/L | 12/69 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0057 mg/L 38% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 11.1545 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.75 µg/L | 8/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 230 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.285 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 7/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 29.91 µg/L 199% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.6 µg/L | 4/69 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 24.8 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.77 pCi/L 35% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.3750 pCi/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 6.51 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
31 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Barnsdall
Is Barnsdall tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Barnsdall's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Barnsdall's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Barnsdall serve?
Barnsdall reports serving 1,243 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Barnsdall had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 2441 violations on file for Barnsdall, of which 1980 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 12 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.