← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Blackwell Municipal Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 97 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

97
contaminants tested
22
detected
7,668
people served
169
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Kay

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

169
health-based violations
233
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromoform
49.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60.5 µg/L
59/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
40.255 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 53.4 µg/L
58/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
13.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.6 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
58.865 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 73.1 µg/L
58/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
26.905 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.7 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
28.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.4 µg/L
57/60 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
158.2 µg/L 198%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 189 µg/L
57/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
10.075 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
56/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.184 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
43/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
5.342 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L
43/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
87 µg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 106 µg/L
41/61 SYR4 2012–2018
Atrazine
0.5730 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6000 µg/L
19/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
840 µg/L 8.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
14/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2024
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.4505 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.56 pCi/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2023
Lead
50.01 µg/L 333%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.5 µg/L
3/61 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3956 pCi/L 7.9%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.4000 pCi/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
1.5985 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.63 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.091 pCi/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.1 pCi/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
24.8 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/58 SYR4 2012–2019
75 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BLACKWELL MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY
Phone
580-363-7250
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Blackwell Municipal Authority

Is Blackwell Municipal Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Blackwell Municipal Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Blackwell Municipal Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromoform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Blackwell Municipal Authority serve?

Blackwell Municipal Authority reports serving 7,668 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Blackwell Municipal Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 233 violations on file for Blackwell Municipal Authority, of which 169 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.