Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.29 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.6 µg/L | 62/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 83.91 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 117 µg/L | 62/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 29.035 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 101.28 µg/L 127% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 129 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 61.19 µg/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.5 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 33.855 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.8 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.7575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.27 µg/L | 46/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 470.75 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 491 µg/L | 16/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.3025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L | 16/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0096 mg/L 64% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 430 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.504 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.57 µg/L | 5/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.63625 pCi/L 33% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.68 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.1955 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.31 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Barium | 7 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Fluoride | 100 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.5380 pCi/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Lead | 12.8 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
41 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Muldrow Pwa
Is Muldrow Pwa tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Muldrow Pwa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Muldrow Pwa's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Muldrow Pwa serve?
Muldrow Pwa reports serving 3,104 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Muldrow Pwa had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 165 violations on file for Muldrow Pwa, of which 140 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.