← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Heavener Utility Auth - Psg

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 81 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

81
contaminants tested
24
detected
3,000
people served
176
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Le Flore

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

176
health-based violations
257
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0088 µg/L 3/8 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
808.404 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2061.24 µg/L
69/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
17.62 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.8 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
99.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 173 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.581 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
58/62 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
108.13 µg/L 135%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 170.6 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
42.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 51.2 µg/L
57/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
62.96 µg/L 105%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 83.3 µg/L
57/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
27.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.1 µg/L
56/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
996 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1110 µg/L
42/54 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0011 mg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
28/28 LCR 2025
Lead
64.0792 µg/L 427%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 90.1174 µg/L
15/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.215 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.55 µg/L
11/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1337.5 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1690 µg/L
6/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
23.5 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2013
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.9735 pCi/L 19%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.9900 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.225 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.25 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
5.015 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
2/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
740 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013
Bromoform
0.6100 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
0.0013 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
5.7 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/9 SYR4 2012–2014
Thallium, Total
1 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2013
57 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HEAVENER UTILITY AUTH/PSG
Phone
918-653-2011
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Heavener Utility Auth - Psg

Is Heavener Utility Auth - Psg tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Heavener Utility Auth - Psg's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Heavener Utility Auth - Psg's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Heavener Utility Auth - Psg serve?

Heavener Utility Auth - Psg reports serving 3,000 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Heavener Utility Auth - Psg had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 257 violations on file for Heavener Utility Auth - Psg, of which 176 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.