Tap WaterIndex

← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Durant Utilities Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 89 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

89
contaminants tested
19
detected
15,545
people served
36
health-based violations
Oklahoma rankingsLead in OklahomaPFAS in Oklahoma
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Bryan

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

36
health-based violations
54
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
86.325 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 107.4 µg/L
136/136 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
71.04 µg/L 118%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 103.9 µg/L
133/136 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.5 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 90 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.48 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.8 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42 µg/L
116/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
32.625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57.6 µg/L
112/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Chlorite
746 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 848 µg/L
96/96 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
53.175 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 124.64 µg/L
71/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.19 µg/L
41/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
35/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0031 mg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 15/15 LCR 2025
Lead
3.7285 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.19 µg/L
14/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
1.482 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.69 µg/L
9/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 5/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.501 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.62 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
27.9 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Combined Uranium
0.0046 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
810 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
70 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDinosebDiquatEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrate-NitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DURANT UTILITIES AUTHORITY
Phone
580-931-6664
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Durant Utilities Authority

Is Durant Utilities Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Durant Utilities Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Durant Utilities Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Durant Utilities Authority serve?

Durant Utilities Authority reports serving 15,545 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Durant Utilities Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 54 violations on file for Durant Utilities Authority, of which 36 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.