Tap WaterIndex

← Ohio

Tap water quality report

Lebanon Correctional Institution

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 85 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

85
contaminants tested
20
detected
3,410
people served
12
health-based violations
Ohio rankingsLead in OhioPFAS in Ohio
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Warren

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
85
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
341.1 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2400 µg/L
99/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
12.75 µg/L 85%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.6 µg/L
68/99 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0044 mg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 23/23 LCR 2025
Arsenic
7.36 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.6 µg/L
17/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.3723 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.241 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.888 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.2 µg/L
14/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
7.103 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.34 µg/L
14/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
10.5595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L
14/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
13.1965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.1 µg/L
14/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
455 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 14/16 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
39.8935 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.9 µg/L
14/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
9.58 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L
13/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
7/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.6765 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
6/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
393.7 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 405 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
385 µg/L 9.6%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.9 pCi/L 38%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.1 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.263 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
190 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2012–2015
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaLassoMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MARINICH, MIKE
Phone
513-932-1211
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Lebanon Correctional Institution

Is Lebanon Correctional Institution tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Lebanon Correctional Institution's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lebanon Correctional Institution's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Arsenic, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lebanon Correctional Institution serve?

Lebanon Correctional Institution reports serving 3,410 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has Lebanon Correctional Institution had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 85 violations on file for Lebanon Correctional Institution, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.