Is Leetonia Village Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Columbiana

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

148

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Chloroform	89.63 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 138.3 µg/L	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.8215 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.28 µg/L	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	105.495 µg/L 132% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 162 µg/L	58/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	64.56 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L worst single sample: 81 µg/L	57/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	14.25 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 20.5 µg/L	56/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	28.975 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 34 µg/L	56/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	36.08 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 43 µg/L	53/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	141 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 374 µg/L	40/40	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0164 mg/L 109% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L	20/20	LCR	2025
Dibromoacetic Acid	8.153 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 18.1 µg/L	15/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	22.79 µg/L 152% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L worst single sample: 41.9 µg/L	15/40	SYR4	2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	4.8 µg/L No EPA limit set	15/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	3.1 µg/L No EPA limit set	7/58	SYR4	2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	17.185 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 21.5 µg/L	6/58	SYR4	2012–2019

Utility contact

Contact: HESS, CHAD A
Phone: 330-457-7106
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Leetonia Village

Is Leetonia Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Leetonia Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Leetonia Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Leetonia Village serve?

Leetonia Village reports serving 1,833 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has Leetonia Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 148 violations on file for Leetonia Village, of which 24 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.