Tap WaterIndex

← New York

Tap water quality report

Central Bridge Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
17
detected
560
people served
571
health-based violations
New York rankingsLead in New YorkPFAS in New York
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Schoharie

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

571
health-based violations
689
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
128.625 µg/L 161%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 261 µg/L
32/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1228 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1600 µg/L
29/29 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
103.11 µg/L 172%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 113.5 µg/L
28/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
10.8 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
23/31 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
7.855 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
206.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 253 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dalapon
1.64 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
7/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
119.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2013
Trichloroacetic Acid
188.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 240 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2013
Nitrate
230 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 6/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2013
Gross Beta Particle Activity
1.8705 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
38 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2016
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.1000 pCi/L 2%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Combined Uranium
0.2100 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/7 SYR4 2012–2013
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
KEYSER, COLE
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Central Bridge Water District

Is Central Bridge Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Central Bridge Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Central Bridge Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Copper, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Central Bridge Water District serve?

Central Bridge Water District reports serving 560 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Central Bridge Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 689 violations on file for Central Bridge Water District, of which 571 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.