Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-07-01 → 2004-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-07-01 → 2004-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-07-01 → 2004-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-07-01 → 2004-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-12-01 → 2001-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-12-01 → 2001-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 5000 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5600 µg/L | 118/118 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 5.885 µg/L 118% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L | 96/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 2.14 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.96 µg/L | 77/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene | 4.49 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.77 µg/L | 63/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 84.1 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 91 µg/L | 40/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 161.675 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 340 µg/L | 26/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 4784 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4870 µg/L | 24/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.5875 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 pCi/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2023 |
| Combined Uranium | 5.27414 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.1537 µg/L | 4/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Lead | 16.556 µg/L 110% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.8 µg/L | 4/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | 0.7000 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 7 µg/L | 1/244 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 0.6000 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/244 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 0.8500 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/33 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 0.7200 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/33 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.7200 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/33 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 100 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/47 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
93 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Locust Valley Wd
Is Locust Valley Wd tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Locust Valley Wd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Locust Valley Wd's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Tetrachloroethylene, Trichloroethylene, cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Locust Valley Wd serve?
Locust Valley Wd reports serving 7,500 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Locust Valley Wd had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Locust Valley Wd, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.