Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 112 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 140 µg/L | 306/308 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 38.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50 µg/L | 306/306 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 305/307 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 118 µg/L 148% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 149 µg/L | 305/307 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 78 µg/L 130% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 114 µg/L | 305/305 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 44.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 69 µg/L | 303/306 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 49/306 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 19/307 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 9.815 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 18/306 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0063 mg/L 42% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 24.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 11/305 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1100 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 16.4 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 3.02 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2016 |
| Copper | 11.69 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Fluoride | 776 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 780 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.4 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.2 pCi/L 24% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Watertown City
Is Watertown City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Watertown City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Watertown City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Watertown City serve?
Watertown City reports serving 27,861 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Watertown City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 65 violations on file for Watertown City, of which 55 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.