Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-06-27 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-06-27 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-06-27 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-06-27 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-06-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-06-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-06-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-08-01 → 1994-08-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 693.5 µg/L 6.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 700 µg/L | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 17.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 99 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.11 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.3 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 17.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 86.9 µg/L 109% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 126 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 36.15 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 18.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L | 17/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.8295 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.07 µg/L | 14/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0051 mg/L 34% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromoform | 1.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 8/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.18366 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.192 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 2.2 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 5/76 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 42.25 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.1472 pCi/L 23% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.178 pCi/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.6980 pCi/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.7400 pCi/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.491 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.56 pCi/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2013 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.4100 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 7.3 µg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
28 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fishkill Plains
Is Fishkill Plains tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Fishkill Plains's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fishkill Plains's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fishkill Plains serve?
Fishkill Plains reports serving 900 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Fishkill Plains had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 88 violations on file for Fishkill Plains, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.