Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.5 µg/L | 96/96 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 97.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 118 µg/L | 96/96 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 22.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.1 µg/L | 96/96 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 110.8 µg/L 139% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 131 µg/L | 96/96 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 68.05 µg/L 113% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 77.2 µg/L | 96/96 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 47.57 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 55.1 µg/L | 94/96 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.59 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 75/94 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L | 64/98 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.736 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.4 µg/L | 29/98 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.54 µg/L | 21/98 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 938 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1040 µg/L | 13/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 168 µg/L 8.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L | 12/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0028 mg/L 19% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate | 2260 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 10/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 47.59 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 48 µg/L | 2/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 0.5000 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/98 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chromium | 1 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.58 pCi/L 52% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
83 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Guilderland Town Wd
Is Guilderland Town Wd tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Guilderland Town Wd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Guilderland Town Wd's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Guilderland Town Wd serve?
Guilderland Town Wd reports serving 30,000 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Guilderland Town Wd had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 57 violations on file for Guilderland Town Wd, of which 34 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.