Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 400 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 30/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2025 |
| Copper | 288 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 380 µg/L | 9/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 600 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 3.75 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 5.145 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 4/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 72.3 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 78 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 390 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 5.898 µg/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L | 3/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.9237 pCi/L 18% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.9460 pCi/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 2 µg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.116 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 11.844 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Chromium | 1 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 83 µg/L 553% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
65 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Empire Mining Company
Is Empire Mining Company tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Empire Mining Company's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Empire Mining Company's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Copper, Fluoride, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Empire Mining Company serve?
Empire Mining Company reports serving 350 people in Nevada, per its EPA record.
Has Empire Mining Company had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 301 violations on file for Empire Mining Company, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.