Tap WaterIndex

← Nevada

Tap water quality report

Kingsbury Gid

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 114 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

114
contaminants tested
19
detected
3,839
people served
9
health-based violations
Nevada rankingsLead in NevadaPFAS in Nevada
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Douglas

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

9
health-based violations
155
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-27
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-27
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
11.65 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 80 µg/L
68/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
66/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
7.575 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
66/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 45 µg/L
66/68 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
17.8 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
65/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.185 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
64/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.415 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
58/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromate
6.735 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
38/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2025
Barium
16.6 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.75 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
64.75 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 84 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
1.0625 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
4/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
3/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.0878 pCi/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.14 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2014
Gross Beta Particle Activity
1.93 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.96 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2014
Antimony, Total
2 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
200 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/9 SYR4 2012–2019
95 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DORNBROOK, DEREK
Phone
775-588-3548
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kingsbury Gid

Is Kingsbury Gid tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Kingsbury Gid's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kingsbury Gid's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kingsbury Gid serve?

Kingsbury Gid reports serving 3,839 people in Nevada, per its EPA record.

Has Kingsbury Gid had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 155 violations on file for Kingsbury Gid, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.