← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Rocky Mount, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
22
detected
55,891
people served
23
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Nash

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

23
health-based violations
1,009
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-06-01 → 2006-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-06-01 → 2006-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-06-01 → 2006-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0086 µg/L 5/7 2025
PFOS 0.0094 µg/L 5/7 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
93.14 µg/L 116%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 182 µg/L
273/273 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
56.15 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 79 µg/L
258/262 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
71 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 96 µg/L
241/241 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
236/236 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
28.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.6 µg/L
234/240 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47 µg/L
227/239 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
187/240 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
8.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
47/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
34/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
13.715 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
30/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
813.65 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 826 µg/L
14/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
Copper
148.25 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 164 µg/L
8/63 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
1.385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
2/241 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.9 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
2/63 SYR4 2014–2017
Atrazine
0.2000 µg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
34 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.2700 pCi/L 5.4%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.94 pCi/L 26%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2013
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.89 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2013
88 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CONNOLLY, JAMES
Phone
252-972-1336
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rocky Mount, City of

Is Rocky Mount, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Rocky Mount, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rocky Mount, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rocky Mount, City of serve?

Rocky Mount, City of reports serving 55,891 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Rocky Mount, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 1009 violations on file for Rocky Mount, City of, of which 23 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.