← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Bayleaf Master

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 44. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
44
detected
16,715
people served
122
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Wake

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

122
health-based violations
412
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0591 µg/L 61/216 2025
Pfhxa 0.0573 µg/L 50/216 2025
PFBS 0.0396 µg/L 46/216 2025
PFHXS 0.1526 µg/L 28/216 2025
PFOA 0.0104 µg/L 18/216 2025
PFOS 0.0213 µg/L 16/216 2025
Pfhpa 0.0137 µg/L 11/216 2025
Pfba 0.0178 µg/L 8/216 2025
Pfpes 0.0364 µg/L 2/216 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3115 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7900 µg/L
280/1624 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
12.75 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
146/226 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
3100 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7900 µg/L
141/806 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
11.83 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.7 pCi/L
127/179 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1306.5 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2850 µg/L
110/124 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
592 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 790 µg/L
97/278 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
5.4 pCi/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 7.1 pCi/L
96/190 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
12.2016 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.923 µg/L
68/180 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
16.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
24/216 UCMR-5 2025
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2025
Dibromochloromethane
5.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
15/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
4.505 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
14/592 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
31.8 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 63 µg/L
14/251 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.98 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
12/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
4.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
12/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
2.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
9/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.46 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
7/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
13.578 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.1 µg/L
5/124 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.485 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
4/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Xylenes, Total
10.605 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
4/345 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
513.9 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 523 µg/L
3/278 SYR4 2012–2019
Dalapon
3.99 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
3/553 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
1.95 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
3/345 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
4.2715 µg/L 71%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.31 µg/L
2/278 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
197 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
2/807 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
13.37 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.4 µg/L
2/278 SYR4 2012–2019
Benzo(A)Pyrene
0.2300 µg/L 115%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 0.2000 µg/L
1/592 SYR4 2012–2019
Cadmium
1.51 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/278 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylene Dibromide
0.0190 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 0.0500 µg/L
1/550 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
0.6200 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
1/345 SYR4 2012–2019
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.0210 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L
1/549 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
0.5800 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/345 SYR4 2012–2019
Thallium, Total
1.66 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/278 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/40 SYR4 2013–2019
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MILLIRON, BRENT
Phone
919-653-6999
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Bayleaf Master

Is Bayleaf Master tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 44 contaminants in Bayleaf Master's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Bayleaf Master's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Nitrate-Nitrite, Gross Beta Particle Activity, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Bayleaf Master serve?

Bayleaf Master reports serving 16,715 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Bayleaf Master had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 412 violations on file for Bayleaf Master, of which 122 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.