Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1844.3 µg/L 142% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 6154 µg/L | 87/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 3252 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4000 µg/L | 38/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 33.4684 µg/L 112% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 106.684 µg/L | 24/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 7.1 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.3 µg/L | 13/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 15.59 pCi/L 312% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 28.9 pCi/L | 12/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 9.794 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 10/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 1.195 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 8/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 5.6 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.92 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 5/5 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.51 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 11.49 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 pCi/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2018 |
| Fluoride | 933 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 960 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1490 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1500 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Dichloromethane | 1.1 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 1.4 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
60 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ashley Hills North S/D
Is Ashley Hills North S/D tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Ashley Hills North S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ashley Hills North S/D's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Combined Uranium, Xylenes, Total, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ashley Hills North S/D serve?
Ashley Hills North S/D reports serving 602 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Ashley Hills North S/D had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 181 violations on file for Ashley Hills North S/D, of which 108 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 8 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.