← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Ashley Hills North S/D

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 78 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

78
contaminants tested
18
detected
602
people served
108
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Wake

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

108
health-based violations
181
violations on file
8
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Addressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1844.3 µg/L 142%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 6154 µg/L
87/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
3252 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4000 µg/L
38/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
33.4684 µg/L 112%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 106.684 µg/L
24/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
7.1 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.3 µg/L
13/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
15.59 pCi/L 312%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 28.9 pCi/L
12/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
9.794 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
10/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
1.195 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
8/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
2.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
5.6 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.92 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
5/5 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
1.51 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
11.49 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 pCi/L
4/4 SYR4 2016–2018
Fluoride
933 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 960 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1490 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1500 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2019
Dichloromethane
1.1 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.4 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2014–2019
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PATEL, HARSHNA
Phone
800-525-7990
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Ashley Hills North S/D

Is Ashley Hills North S/D tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Ashley Hills North S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ashley Hills North S/D's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Combined Uranium, Xylenes, Total, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ashley Hills North S/D serve?

Ashley Hills North S/D reports serving 602 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Ashley Hills North S/D had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 181 violations on file for Ashley Hills North S/D, of which 108 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 8 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.