Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-10-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 31.7 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 127/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 81.9 µg/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 87 µg/L | 122/122 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 27.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 100/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 35.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50 µg/L | 100/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 30.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34 µg/L | 98/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 97/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L | 96/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 8.49 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L | 75/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 187.2 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 256 µg/L | 53/119 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 22 µg/L No EPA limit set | 47/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Atrazine | 0.4120 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4400 µg/L | 9/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 722 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 750 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.47 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 7/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.2725 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2800 µg/L | 6/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 5.568 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 5/119 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Cyanide | 177.5 µg/L 89% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 6.015 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.1 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 2/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1100 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1100 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
79 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Dunn, City of
Is Dunn, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 29 contaminants in Dunn, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Dunn, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Dunn, City of serve?
Dunn, City of reports serving 12,442 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Dunn, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 16 violations on file for Dunn, City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.