Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2000-05-01 → 2000-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2000-05-01 → 2000-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2000-05-01 → 2000-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 15.1 pCi/L 302% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 20.3 pCi/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2200 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 606.25 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 829 µg/L | 10/61 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 63.6 µg/L 80% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64 µg/L | 9/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 18.83 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.9 pCi/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 27.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 22 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2175 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2200 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 17.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 37.8 µg/L 63% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 38 µg/L | 5/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.5645 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 2/2 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 5.3595 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.41 µg/L | 2/61 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
62 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Stoney Point Ws/Fayetteville Pwc
Is Stoney Point Ws/Fayetteville Pwc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Stoney Point Ws/Fayetteville Pwc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Stoney Point Ws/Fayetteville Pwc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Nitrate, Copper, TTHM, Gross Beta Particle Activity, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Stoney Point Ws/Fayetteville Pwc serve?
Stoney Point Ws/Fayetteville Pwc reports serving 515 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Stoney Point Ws/Fayetteville Pwc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Stoney Point Ws/Fayetteville Pwc, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.