← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Fayetteville Public Works Comm

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 27. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
27
detected
226,441
people served
5
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cumberland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
17
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-08-08
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2019-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0121 µg/L 8/8 2024
Pfhxa 0.0182 µg/L 8/8 2024
PFHXS 0.0191 µg/L 8/8 2024
PFOA 0.0110 µg/L 8/8 2024
PFOS 0.0218 µg/L 8/8 2024
Pfpea 0.0215 µg/L 8/8 2024
Pfhpa 0.0070 µg/L 5/8 2024
Pfba 0.0114 µg/L 4/8 2024
6:2 Fts 0.0077 µg/L 1/8 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
77 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 91 µg/L
262/263 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
48 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 68 µg/L
261/262 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
36.09 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50.63 µg/L
255/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
26.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39 µg/L
253/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
250/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
25.034 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L
247/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
238/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
203/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
156/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
15.49 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.59 µg/L
116/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
10 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
80/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3.8 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 32 µg/L
25/120 SYR4 2014–2017
Copper
150.5 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L
20/120 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
760.7 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 774 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2025
Nitrate
1160 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.4 pCi/L 23%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2016
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.6 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2016
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromateChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GREEN, JASON
Phone
910-223-4710
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Fayetteville Public Works Comm

Is Fayetteville Public Works Comm tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in Fayetteville Public Works Comm's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fayetteville Public Works Comm's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fayetteville Public Works Comm serve?

Fayetteville Public Works Comm reports serving 226,441 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Fayetteville Public Works Comm had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for Fayetteville Public Works Comm, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.