← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Country Estates Mhp

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 78 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

78
contaminants tested
14
detected
60
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Chatham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
464
violations on file
12
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-02-06
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01
RPT Monitoring Addressed 2024-04-01
RPT Monitoring Addressed 2024-04-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Barium
490.4 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 493 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
9.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Dibromochloromethane
7.31 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
3/3 LCR 2025
TTHM
18.4 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Bromodichloromethane
2.645 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Copper
134.805 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 138 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.975 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2018
Combined Uranium
6.28035 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3474 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Fluoride
138.5 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
7.335 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.56 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2014–2018
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HORTON, TODD OR LAURA
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Country Estates Mhp

Is Country Estates Mhp tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Country Estates Mhp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Country Estates Mhp's water?

EPA monitoring detected Barium, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Country Estates Mhp serve?

Country Estates Mhp reports serving 60 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Country Estates Mhp had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 464 violations on file for Country Estates Mhp, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 12 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.