Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-01-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 72.1 µg/L 90% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L | 131/131 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 31.5 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L | 131/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 109/109 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 61.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 89 µg/L | 109/109 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 18.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L | 106/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 106/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 150 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L | 88/179 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.345 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 52/109 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 9.815 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 31 µg/L | 20/179 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 803 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 810 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 610 µg/L 6.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 0.0222 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0238 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 222.103 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 261 pCi/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.905 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 4/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 16.8 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.8984 pCi/L 18% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.9170 pCi/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Dichloromethane | 0.9790 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9800 µg/L | 3/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.9742 pCi/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.06 pCi/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 9.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 600 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
89 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Shelby, City of
Is Shelby, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Shelby, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Shelby, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Shelby, City of serve?
Shelby, City of reports serving 23,600 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Shelby, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 42 violations on file for Shelby, City of, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.