← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Harrisburg, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
25
detected
20,549
people served
26
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cabarrus

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

26
health-based violations
71
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOS 0.0103 µg/L 16/24 2025
PFHXS 0.0049 µg/L 12/24 2025
Pfpea 0.0041 µg/L 8/24 2025
Pfhxa 0.0033 µg/L 4/24 2025
PFBS 0.0042 µg/L 2/24 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
103.505 µg/L 129%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 127.1 µg/L
132/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
62.2 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 92.6 µg/L
131/131 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
116/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
86.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 108.4 µg/L
116/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
32.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.3 µg/L
116/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
29.23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
115/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
228 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 680 µg/L
105/180 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
2.79 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
95/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.925 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.2 µg/L
36/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2025
Barium
35.3 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L
8/12 SYR4 2012–2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity
5.7 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
8/9 SYR4 2012–2014
Fluoride
633 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 720 µg/L
7/14 SYR4 2012–2017
Arsenic
2.525 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
6/12 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromoform
1.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
5/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
12.6 µg/L 84%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
5/180 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
20.605 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.6 µg/L
2/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
1.1 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/12 SYR4 2012–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
1.3 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/12 SYR4 2012–2017
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
YOUNG, JONATHAN
Phone
704-455-0746
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Harrisburg, Town of

Is Harrisburg, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Harrisburg, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Harrisburg, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Harrisburg, Town of serve?

Harrisburg, Town of reports serving 20,549 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Harrisburg, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 71 violations on file for Harrisburg, Town of, of which 26 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.