← Maine

Tap water quality report

Greater Augusta Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
18
detected
13,750
people served
2
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Kennebec

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
11
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1999-12-06
TT Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1999-12-06
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-12-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2009-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2009-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2009-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
430 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1220 µg/L
247/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
800 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 900 µg/L
142/144 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.51 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
127/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1610 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2000 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0011 mg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
9.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
9/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
16.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
9/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
9/15 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
30.04 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
4.55 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
19.25 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
3.3 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
1132.5 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Uranium
3.18 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2015–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.48 µg/L 9.1%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.033 pCi/L 21%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.047 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
TARBUCK, BRIAN
Phone
207-622-3701
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Greater Augusta Utility District

Is Greater Augusta Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Greater Augusta Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Greater Augusta Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Nitrate, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Greater Augusta Utility District serve?

Greater Augusta Utility District reports serving 13,750 people in Maine, per its EPA record.

Has Greater Augusta Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 11 violations on file for Greater Augusta Utility District, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.