Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 88.6 µg/L 111% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 122.7 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 24.92 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 27.4 µg/L | 36/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 27.547 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 29.998 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 87 µg/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 18.081 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.26 µg/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1009.35 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1030 µg/L | 22/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.755 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L | 19/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.167 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.31 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 12.8745 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.1 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.21 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lead | 0.0014 mg/L 9.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2024 |
| Fluoride | 175.95 µg/L 4.4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 177 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Barium | 13.12 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Benzo(A)Pyrene | 0.1100 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 0.7000 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.2 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Heptachlor Epoxide | 0.1700 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Hexachlorocyclopentadiene | 4.9 µg/L 9.8% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Selenium | 3 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Xylenes, Total | 1.7 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
51 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Riddle Farm
Is Riddle Farm tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Riddle Farm's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Riddle Farm's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Riddle Farm serve?
Riddle Farm reports serving 500 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.
Has Riddle Farm had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Riddle Farm, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.