← Maryland

Tap water quality report

Easton Utilities

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
19
detected
17,357
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Talbot

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
7
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
10.212 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.05 µg/L
97/110 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
7.318 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.35 µg/L
33/45 SYR4 2012–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.59 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
31/110 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
3696 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3960 µg/L
28/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.626 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
19/45 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromochloromethane
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
13/45 SYR4 2012–2017
Lead
0.0021 mg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.042 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.15 µg/L
10/38 SYR4 2012–2015
Gross Beta Particle Activity
9.73 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 pCi/L
7/8 SYR4 2013–2017
Barium
73.125 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 73.2 µg/L
6/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Nitrate
1080 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/76 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
2.325 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
2/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.385 pCi/L 28%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.4 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.3465 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.36 µg/L
2/38 SYR4 2012–2015
Lithium
9.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/8 UCMR-5 2023
Arsenic
5 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Bromoform
0.3400 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/45 SYR4 2012–2017
Dichloromethane
0.5200 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.2 pCi/L 15%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/9 SYR4 2013–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrate-NitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ABBOTT, JR, DOUGLAS
Phone
410-822-6110
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Easton Utilities

Is Easton Utilities tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Easton Utilities's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Easton Utilities's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Fluoride, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Easton Utilities serve?

Easton Utilities reports serving 17,357 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.

Has Easton Utilities had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 7 violations on file for Easton Utilities, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.